CurtHagenlocher commented on PR #584: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/584#issuecomment-4672804323
> There is also no current alternative for nano timestamps that need to span the SQL time RAnge (years 0001-9999) As someone not really in the Spark world, doesn't the persistence of this type imply there's a need that Parquet isn't filling without it? Is it worth reconsidering its deprecation? I agree with @wgtmac that it's a bit weird to say "don't use this type! but if you do, then change your writers to emit this new sort order." -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
