markrmiller commented on pull request #265: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/265#issuecomment-907034437
> Seems like it should have generated a ticket with Jetty at least since while the spec doesn't actually state that the call to init() > must have been completed, that sure sounds like something the spec authors wouldn't have thought necessary to say... I doubt it was ever actually their issue. I could care less about the webapp spec, webapp's are terrible, but filter init / process is fairly fundamental and unlikely to be gotten wrong by any container out there, other than perhaps a short lived high level blunder. Plenty of things up the stack they would be toast on if this was a standard problem. More likely someone was looking at tests when they looked at that particular race. If you hotwire a filter into Jetty, you can mostly certainly do it in a way that will not follow any specs or rules, or sanity if you so choose or fall into. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
