epugh commented on PR #1923: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1923#issuecomment-1719485929
So this all makes sense. One thing that I think we lose a bit is that I used to take the commands in the BATS script and run the to test out things locally in Solr, and so haveing the 8983 was convenient ;-). One thing is, if we move bats tests to NOT running in the 8983 port number, well, it might be nice for me to run locally 8983 solr, and then run the bats tests to see if I get it all working. Sometimes I get a setup of Solr (on 8983) that is donig what I want. Now I want to write an integration tests. So then I am constantly stopping the 8983, running the bats, and then starting 8983, as I work through it. If we move the bats tests to run in the higher port numbers, then i can have my solr running on 8983, 8984 etc, and then bats ones are running on the 10000 and higher range??? Do we then maybe NOT want the test_zz behavior? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
