gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2470: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2470#discussion_r1608058864
########## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/filestore/FileStoreUtils.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.solr.filestore; + +import java.io.IOException; +import java.io.InputStream; +import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles; +import java.util.ArrayList; +import java.util.Collections; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Map; +import java.util.Set; +import java.util.function.Consumer; +import java.util.function.Supplier; +import org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; +import org.apache.solr.core.BlobRepository; +import org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer; +import org.apache.solr.util.CryptoKeys; +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +/** Common utilities used by filestore-related code. */ +public class FileStoreUtils { + private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MethodHandles.lookup().lookupClass()); + + /** get a list of nodes randomly shuffled * @lucene.internal */ Review Comment: Idk - it was in the Javadoc when I copied this method out of FileStoreAPI. We're not in SolrJ so the original author probably wasn't worried about signaling backcompat - my guess was that 'lucene.internal' was more about signaling that this was an implementation detail and that folks should be leery of calling the method? I'll remove it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
