[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184906#comment-14184906
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1114:
--------------------------------------
Github user ykrips commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/206#issuecomment-60557163
Hello @hyunsik ,
I will fix some missing points for your comments, and will rebase it.
On my implementation, I have overrided some functions of Configuration
class to raise exceptions when invalid values are inserted. However, with your
explanation, I feel that TajoMaster will throw exceptions, not TajoConf. I just
wonder if I correctly understand your strategy.
> Improve ConfVars (SessionVar) to take a validator interface to check its
> input.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1114
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1114
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
> Assignee: Jihun Kang
> Fix For: 0.9.1
>
>
> Each task uses session variables from client or configs from tajo-site.xml.
> The session variables and configs are used in task during query processing.
> If invalid configs or invalid session variables are used for a query, the
> error will be caused in a runtime instead of query init phase. It's bad
> situation. Invalid values must be detected at the initialization phase.
> Because each session variable or config varies in its value type and value
> range, It would be great if each ConfigKey takes a validator for its value
> and Tajo uses validators for it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)