Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Sandbox is a experimental playpen, with no > > distinguishable individual > > contents. In fact, the guidelines say it should not > > be available to the > > public, either -- should we remove the anonymous CVS > > link to it that I > > created by habit? > > > > I'd prefer to leave it, if that's OK. It should be a > good way to generate interest in new projects. I > don't see any reason why users can't submit patches, > etc. too, as long as we're clear that sandbox > components are not guaranteed to reach fruition. +1 in addition, we should stop thinking of them as 'sandbox components' geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- RE: Jakarta Commons Website up Waldhoff, Rodney
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Morgan Delagrange