Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > Geir, you seemed happy with Repository. Is that still > the case? I'm willing to change the name to > Repository, unless there are other supporters of > Commons Proper, in which case we'll vote. I'm not > married to Commons Proper, I just don't like the name > Components. The whole project is about components. > I'm a little hesitant about Repository, since the > Sandbox is also a repository, but I think it's clear > enough. I like repository, but am waiting to hear what others think. And I don't think of sandbox as a 'repository' as it's unorganized. > > Clarity is key. We have to pretend we haven't been > discussing these issues for months and look at the > organization of the project with a critical eye. +1 -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website up Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Commons Website ... Morgan Delagrange
- RE: Jakarta Commons Website up Waldhoff, Rodney