Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>
> --- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > >
> > > --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sandbox is a experimental playpen, with no
> > > > distinguishable individual
> > > > contents. In fact, the guidelines say it should
> > not
> > > > be available to the
> > > > public, either -- should we remove the anonymous
> > CVS
> > > > link to it that I
> > > > created by habit?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'd prefer to leave it, if that's OK. It should
> > be a
> > > good way to generate interest in new projects. I
> > > don't see any reason why users can't submit
> > patches,
> > > etc. too, as long as we're clear that sandbox
> > > components are not guaranteed to reach fruition.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > in addition, we should stop thinking of them as
> > 'sandbox components'
>
> I agree. I think it's going to take some work to
> convince folks to use the sandbox for projects that
> are not component-oriented, but I hope that it
> happens. Jakarta needs a scratch pad.
*Of course* you use the sandbox for component-oriented projects - you
just do them there before approved to be a Repository Component.
You can scratch whatever you want in the scratchpad...
...question : how do we get rid of old cruft as time goes on...?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
