Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package

Craig R. McClanahan Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:39:00 -0700


+1 on this, although I'd suggest it be named "httpclient" (in case we ever
try to abstract the HTTP server side stuff into a Commons package as
well).

Craig

- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Scott Sanders
- - Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Geir Magnusson Jr.
  - - Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Scott Sanders
    - - Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Geir Magnusson Jr.
      - Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Pac... Scott Sanders
Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Scott Sanders
[PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Craig R. McClanahan
- - Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library packa... Remy Maucherat
- [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a commons c... Remy Maucherat
- - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Craig R. McClanahan
  - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Scott Sanders
  - - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Craig R. McClanahan
  - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Alex Fernández
  - - RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Mike Braden
    - - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library packag... Alex Fernández
  - RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Mike Braden
  - Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Vincent Massol

Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package

Reply via email to