A minor point: In 1.5 you say "HTTP Client relies on: Java Development Kit (Version 1.1 or later; 1.3 or later recommended)" How can you recommend a JDK that isn't yet published? Perhaps 1.4 will be a bad JDK. So I'd say, drop the "or later" and just state "1.3 recommended". Un saludo, Alex. Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose the HTTP client library as a commons component. The > detailed proposal is attached to this email (unless it somehow get stripped > by the mailing list manager), and it's also available at : > http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-commons-sandbo > x/httpclient/PROPOSAL.html?rev=1.3&content-type=text/plain > > The component name will be httpclient. > > Remy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: PROPOSAL.html > PROPOSAL.html Type: Hypertext Markup Language (text/html) > Encoding: quoted-printable
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Scott Sanders
- [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library packa... Remy Maucherat
- [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a commons c... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Scott Sanders
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Alex Fernández
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Mike Braden
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library packag... Alex Fernández
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Mike Braden
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Vincent Massol
- RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Waldhoff, Rodney
- RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Waldhoff, Rodney