It is usually typical for a version recommendation to be
x.x or later
I guess you could have issues with depreciations in the newer API?
Mike.
--
Mike Braden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a commons component
A minor point: In 1.5 you say
"HTTP Client relies on:
Java Development Kit (Version 1.1 or later; 1.3 or later
recommended)"
How can you recommend a JDK that isn't yet published? Perhaps 1.4 will
be a bad JDK.
So I'd say, drop the "or later" and just state "1.3 recommended".
Un saludo,
Alex.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the HTTP client library as a commons component. The
> detailed proposal is attached to this email (unless it somehow get
stripped
> by the mailing list manager), and it's also available at :
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-commons-sandbo
> x/httpclient/PROPOSAL.html?rev=1.3&content-type=text/plain
>
> The component name will be httpclient.
>
> Remy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: PROPOSAL.html
> PROPOSAL.html Type: Hypertext Markup Language (text/html)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
