> No serial_hardware.jal is not used just a simple routine

OK, I've no time right now to have a look, but maybe it's better to use 
existing serial_hardware.jal. See sample to understand how to use it.

> To be on the safe side I will ask Bert opinion because I don’t want to
> make the impression that I steel somebody’s idea or libs.

OK. I've seen your jallist post. 

> I understand but I can’t find any validated 16f877 include files yet
> and I hoped you all can say if you want to use the lib

If you mean in "/validated" dir, it's normal, since there's no release yet. 
You have to deal with "/unvalidated", where you'll find a 16f877.jal file.

> If not, because you already have a good one, no problem but then it is
> not necessary to change it all to repository.

We won't add any device files except those generated by Rob's dev2jal script. 
See /unvalidated/include/device to see them all.

> Then maybe its better to change the st7036 functionality to your lcd
> lib to keep a standard.
> If you want to test it you can change the 16f887?ok.jal to your own
> 16f887 include file should be no problem except you have to remove
> some parameters in the main file because they are probably already
> assigned in the common include files

Is it ok for *you* to re-write the sample using our device file ? There's 
probably more than just an include to change.

> >  * be careful with indentation
>
> to mutch ore to big?

No, not consistent. Sometime it's indented with 2 spaces, sometimes more. 
Sometimes it doesn't need to be indented, but suddenly becomes to be 
indented. This actually quite confusing when reading the code, you sometime 
don't know if you're in a procedure or not, if you're on the main, etc... 
When entering a block (procedure/function/if/for, ...) you need to indent one 
level more, etc... See existing lib as examples.

> As a mentioned above maybe its better to change the st7036 to the
> functionality of your hd44780 to keep a standard and to remove mine
> hd44780.

OK, I'm not sure to understand the whole thing, but I suggest the following:

 * since we already have a hd44780 lib, your lib *might* not be useful. Maybe 
you could test the existing ones, with the provided samples 
(sample/external/lcd) (Note these samples need more work, since not JSG 
compliant. Eur ?). If you think it must be improved, we'll include some of 
your lib, as a external lib (another extra lib), or within the existing lib 
file, we'll see.

 * put your st7036 lib to the repos, we'll have a look, change include 
statements as needed, then we'll create samples.

What do you think about this ? Is it ok for you ?


Cheers,
Seb
-- 
Sébastien LELONG
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to