> So you mean: > > * Redistributions in programmed target chips can omit this copyright > notice if it contains no copyright notice at all and has no materials of > any kind provided with the distribution.
I don't understand the part about "no copyright notice at all and has no materials of any kind provided with the distribution". Why ? Do you mean: if there's absolutely no traces at all of jallib, then you can distribute it in the wild ? Isn't it a litlle bit too... (can't find a word, something between risky and unfair) ? This makes me think the following: every piece of work you provide has a license, the default is "as-is". So, in anyway, you'll have to say something about the license, what the media. Again, for me the copyright notice must be reproduce by the redistribution, not by the binary form. Don't you think ? You can even consider the release package (tarball/zip) as a binary form. Packages themselves can't reproduce the notice, BUT there's a LICENSE in them, that is the redistribution media. > Sorry to bring this up again, I read your message as an invitation to > finish it up. No, it's ok, this needs to be done. It's no big deal for me too, but I just don't want this work to be steal in any kind, and that all authors and authorship be respected. > It's no big deal for me. Afaik the current license > forbids the distribution without the notice, but we can tolerate it > anyway. That's a option. We can tolerate it. Seb -- Sébastien LELONG http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
