On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:30 , Joep Suijs wrote: > Well, since nobody else did response, there is one aspect to decide > upon: when a chip or hex file is distributed as part of a package, > should a copyright notice be part of that package? > I'd say: yes.
Plain english, in my interpretation: if you just distribute programmed PICs, no attribution is necessary. If you distribute paper, computer files, or even smoke signals, yes: attribution is necessary. > > So a text suggestion (not beeing a lawyer) : > * Redistributions in binary form can omit this copyright notice if > it contains no copyright notice at all and has no materials of any > kind provided with the distribution. My take: Redistributions in binary form can omit this copyright notice if it has no materials of any kind provided with the distribution that could support it. --- ir EE van Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fiwihex.nl Fiwihex B.V. Wierdensestraat 74, NL7604BK Almelo, Netherlands tel+31-546-491106 fax+31-546-491107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
