> I'm curious why you chose the more restrictive form of the BSD > license, rather than the "simplified" version which also referenced on > the same page?
I'm not sure how more restrictive would a 3-clauses BSD license be, compared to the 2-clauses FreeBSD style. AFAIK this is more about "protecting" the authors. This would give a MIT license equivalent (why not?). And, anyway, this won't resolve the problem about binary forms and programmed chips. Cheers, Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
