> I really don't mind the name change > from _binary to _bin, but if this > lib takes over print.jal who will modify the samples? Are > there any > samples using _binary?
In jallib-pack-2.4o-0.7.1 these samples use print_*_binary: 16f648a_serial_print.jal 16f723_adc_independent.jal (only a comment) 16f723_serial_print.jal 16f73_adc_dependent.jal (comment) 16f73_serial_print.jal 16f876a_tc77.jal 16f877a_adc_dependent.jal (comment) 16f877_adc_dependent.jal (comment) 16f877a_print_serial_numbers.jal 16f877a_serial_print.jal 16f877_serial_print.jal 16f88_adc_highres.jal (comment) 16f88_adc_independent.jal (comment) 16f88_print_serial_numbers.jal 16f88_serial_print.jal 18f14k50_adc_independent.jal (comment) 18f14k50_serial_print.jal 18f2450_adc_dependent.jal (comment) 18f2450_serial_print.jal 18f4550_adc_dependent.jal (comment) 18f4550_ir2serial.jal 18f4550_serial_print.jal Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
