Hi matt! > Hey Guys, I was thinking about making > a library for POSTINC1 & > POSTINC2. Let me know what you think. Would it be a useful > lib?
Useful, yes. But dangerous, AFAIK. We've been talking about indf registers before, and how we can be sure the compiler does not change the pointers. Then, Kyle said it was safe to use INDF1 and INDF2, as the compiler itself does not use them *YET*. I think he said that the compiler might use more INDF registers in the future. If this happens, this library can not be used anymore. Don't take this as a vote against such a lib. I just think it's important to think about this point. Maybe we even discourage Kyle from improving the compiler ;-) Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
