Hey Guys, I was just wondering how I should go forward with this. Should I use this, or should it be left to the compiler? What would have more benefit?
I stated my point which is that it is fast for copying arrays, and as you know, USB currently uses POSTINC1. I just think there should be some kind of decision made. Either stay with using POSTINC, or not. If not, USB libs should be modified accordingly. Some of you may have seen my post on Jallist. Kyle said if he does decide to use these, he will create a pragma or command line option to enable it. I would like to go with whatever everyone feels is best for the group and for JAL. Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
