Thanks guys, I'll get some input from Kyle.

Matt.

On Feb 21, 4:29 pm, Oliver Seitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi matt!
>
> > Hey Guys, I was thinking about making
> > a library for POSTINC1 &
> > POSTINC2. Let me know what you think. Would it be a useful
> > lib?
>
> Useful, yes. But dangerous, AFAIK. We've been talking about indf registers 
> before, and how we can be sure the compiler does not change the pointers. 
> Then, Kyle said it was safe to use INDF1 and INDF2, as the compiler itself 
> does not use them *YET*. I think he said that the compiler might use more 
> INDF registers in the future. If this happens, this library can not be used 
> anymore.
>
> Don't take this as a vote against such a lib. I just think it's important to 
> think about this point. Maybe we even discourage Kyle from improving the 
> compiler ;-)
>
> Greets,
> Kiste

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to