Ok, so to summarize, we were discussing about choosing between maven and forrest, and now you are telling us that centiped is also nice to look at... So you're making our choice harder! ;-)
Nicola, how does Centipede positions itself in regard to maven and forrest? Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Forrest does only documentation, and we will make a Forrest plugin to > Maven available as soon as we finish the current discussion on > finalizing the DTD. > > So Maven and Forrest will work together, but this will not > (fortunately) stop Maven developers to maintain their Velocity based > site creation system. > > > As for the build system, I find Maven slow and alpha. > > Slow it is (remember to check beta5, notb4), and is based on a yet2be > released jakarta commons sandbox called Jelly, and Werkz, not Apache. > > Some Turbine folks also had reservations on using Maven current beta > for the next release. > > > I have a similar project based on Ant, that works with the Gump > descriptors, called Centipede, on www.krysalis.org. > > It integrates a forrest plugin, and has many more plugins. > It also downloads dependencies and is very easy to extend, since it > uses Ant 1.5. > We had plugins (called cents) long before Maven, and our system is > used on Jakarta POI jakarta.apache.org/poi and Forrest itself. > > Currently we are in the process of making dependency-based compilation > work OOTB with the Gump descriptor, more on that soon :-) > -- !try; do() -- Vincent Keunen, Ir, http://vincent.keunen.net Manex, rue Wagner 93, BE-4100 Boncelles, Belgium Our site: http://www.manex.be -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
