--- In [email protected], Kurniawan W
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with you and better to use plain Japanese ?mottomo yoku
tsukawareru kanji 2000". How about the word ?2000?, can I change it
into the kanji ?nisen?, becoming ?mottomo yoku tsukawareru kanji
nisen??
Sure you can.
> Can I also used ?mottomo yoku tsukawareru nisen no kanji?? Which
one is better?
Yes, you can. For a title, I think the first one is better, but
that's my personal liking -- you can choose whichever you like.
Kamui
>
>
> kamuininja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You're missing the point
here. Those "yoji jukugo" (four-character
> phrases) like "wa-kon yo-sai" express rather complicated ideas
> compactly in just four kanji, and they're fairly well-known. But
> the title I gave above is not compact (or easy to understand) at
all
> compared to the kana-kanji title I gave in the first place
("mottomo
> yoku tsukawareru kanji 2000). When you can express ideas clearly
in
> plain Japanese, you shouldn't use a series of big kanji words --
> your readers won't benefit from it.
>
> Kamui
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Personals
> Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
> Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/9rHolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Japanese_Language/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
