-----------------------------
Please read the FAQ!
<http://java.apache.org/faq/>
-----------------------------
Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> The JVM is the problem, pure and simple. As these tests that everyone is
> claiming show this or show that, _either_ of the tested platforms could
> easily handle more than a couple of million hits a day when serving static
> content. NT+IIS _should_ beat Apache on Linux for static content, and
> that is just fine since it has very little real world impact.
>
> The limiting factor in this case is almost entirely due to the Linux JVMs.
> If there were more mature JVMs on Linux (which would come with a few
> fixes to the Linux kernel and a few libraries), there wouldn't be a
> problem.
>
Mark, can I stick this up on a wall under a big title like "Words from
God?"... Right, dammit, you're perfectly right...
Pier
--
Pierpaolo Fumagalli - IBM Center for Java Technologies
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
======================================================
IBM Notes ID: Pierpaolo Fumagalli/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Telephone: +1 (408) 777-5838 - IBM Tieline #: 240-5838
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
