Hi George, There's been a sudden burst of activity lately on 2.9 development...
I know there are some biggish remaining features we may want to get into 2.9: * The new field cache (LUCENE-831; still being iterated/mulled), * Possible major rework of Field / Document & index-time vs search-time Document * Applying filters via random-access API when possible & performant (LUCENE-1536) * Possible further optimizations to how collection works (LUCENE-1593) * Maybe breaking core + contrib into a more uniform set of modules (and figuring out how Trie(Numeric)RangeQuery/Filter fits in here) -- the Modularization uber-thread. * Further improvements to near-realtime search (using RAMDir for small recently flushed segments) * Many other small things and probably some big ones that I'm forgetting now :) So things are still in flux, and I'm really not sure on a release date at this point. Late last year, I was hoping for early this year, but it's no longer early this year ;) Mike On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > This is George Aroush, I'm one of the committers on Lucene.Net - a port of > Java Lucene to C# Lucene. > > I'm looking at the current trunk code of yet to be released Lucene 2.9 and I > would like to port it to Lucene.Net. If I do this now, we get the benefit > of keeping our code base and release dates much closer to Java Lucene. > However, this comes with a cost of carrying over unfinished work, known > defects, and I have to keep an eye on new code that get committed into Java > Lucene which must be ported over in a timely fashion. > > To help me determine when is a good time to start the port -- keep in mind, > I will be taking the latest code off SVN -- I like to hear from the Java > Lucene committers (and users who are playing or using Lucene 2.9 off SVN) > about those questions: > > 1) how stable the current code in the trunk is, > 2) do you still have feature work to deliver or just bug fixes, and > 3) what's your target date to release Java Lucene 2.9 > > #1 is important, such that is anyone using it in production? > > Yes, I did look at the current open issues in JIRA, but that doesn't help me > answer the above questions. > > Regards, > > -- George > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org