Thanks Mike. A quick follow up question. What's the status of http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313? Can this work be applied to Lucene 2.4.1 and still get it's benefit or are there other dependency / issues with it that prevents us from doing so?
If anyone else knows, I welcome your input. -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:36 AM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) > > Hi George, > > There's been a sudden burst of activity lately on 2.9 development... > > I know there are some biggish remaining features we may want > to get into 2.9: > > * The new field cache (LUCENE-831; still being iterated/mulled), > > * Possible major rework of Field / Document & index-time vs > search-time Document > > * Applying filters via random-access API when possible & performant > (LUCENE-1536) > > * Possible further optimizations to how collection works > (LUCENE-1593) > > * Maybe breaking core + contrib into a more uniform set of modules > (and figuring out how Trie(Numeric)RangeQuery/Filter fits in here) > -- the Modularization uber-thread. > > * Further improvements to near-realtime search (using RAMDir for > small recently flushed segments) > > * Many other small things and probably some big ones that I'm > forgetting now :) > > So things are still in flux, and I'm really not sure on a > release date at this point. Late last year, I was hoping for > early this year, but it's no longer early this year ;) > > Mike > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, George Aroush > <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > This is George Aroush, I'm one of the committers on Lucene.Net - a > > port of Java Lucene to C# Lucene. > > > > I'm looking at the current trunk code of yet to be released > Lucene 2.9 > > and I would like to port it to Lucene.Net. If I do this > now, we get > > the benefit of keeping our code base and release dates much > closer to Java Lucene. > > However, this comes with a cost of carrying over unfinished work, > > known defects, and I have to keep an eye on new code that get > > committed into Java Lucene which must be ported over in a > timely fashion. > > > > To help me determine when is a good time to start the port > -- keep in > > mind, I will be taking the latest code off SVN -- I like to > hear from > > the Java Lucene committers (and users who are playing or > using Lucene > > 2.9 off SVN) about those questions: > > > > 1) how stable the current code in the trunk is, > > 2) do you still have feature work to deliver or just bug fixes, and > > 3) what's your target date to release Java Lucene 2.9 > > > > #1 is important, such that is anyone using it in production? > > > > Yes, I did look at the current open issues in JIRA, but > that doesn't > > help me answer the above questions. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
