George, did you mean LUCENE-1516 below? (LUCENE-1313 is a further improvement to near real-time search that's still being iterated on).
In general I would say 2.9 seems to be in rather active development still ;) I too would love to hear about production/beta use of 2.9. George maybe you should re-ask on java-user? Mike On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: > Thanks all for your input on this subject. > > So, if I decide to grab the current code off the trunk, is it: > > 1) Usable for production use? > 2) Is LUCENE-1313 (Realtime search), in the current trunk, stable and ready > for use? > > Put another way, is anyone using the current trunk code in production, or > even as beta? > > -- George > > ________________________________ > From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:13 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) > > LUCENE-1313 relies on LUCENE-1516 which is in trunk. If you have other > questions George, feel free to ask. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:04 AM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: >> >> Thanks Mike. >> >> A quick follow up question. What's the status of >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313? Can this work be >> applied >> to Lucene 2.4.1 and still get it's benefit or are there other dependency / >> issues with it that prevents us from doing so? >> >> If anyone else knows, I welcome your input. >> >> -- George >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:36 AM >> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) >> > >> > Hi George, >> > >> > There's been a sudden burst of activity lately on 2.9 development... >> > >> > I know there are some biggish remaining features we may want >> > to get into 2.9: >> > >> > * The new field cache (LUCENE-831; still being iterated/mulled), >> > >> > * Possible major rework of Field / Document & index-time vs >> > search-time Document >> > >> > * Applying filters via random-access API when possible & performant >> > (LUCENE-1536) >> > >> > * Possible further optimizations to how collection works >> > (LUCENE-1593) >> > >> > * Maybe breaking core + contrib into a more uniform set of modules >> > (and figuring out how Trie(Numeric)RangeQuery/Filter fits in here) >> > -- the Modularization uber-thread. >> > >> > * Further improvements to near-realtime search (using RAMDir for >> > small recently flushed segments) >> > >> > * Many other small things and probably some big ones that I'm >> > forgetting now :) >> > >> > So things are still in flux, and I'm really not sure on a >> > release date at this point. Late last year, I was hoping for >> > early this year, but it's no longer early this year ;) >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, George Aroush >> > <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: >> > > Hi Folks, >> > > >> > > This is George Aroush, I'm one of the committers on Lucene.Net - a >> > > port of Java Lucene to C# Lucene. >> > > >> > > I'm looking at the current trunk code of yet to be released >> > Lucene 2.9 >> > > and I would like to port it to Lucene.Net. If I do this >> > now, we get >> > > the benefit of keeping our code base and release dates much >> > closer to Java Lucene. >> > > However, this comes with a cost of carrying over unfinished work, >> > > known defects, and I have to keep an eye on new code that get >> > > committed into Java Lucene which must be ported over in a >> > timely fashion. >> > > >> > > To help me determine when is a good time to start the port >> > -- keep in >> > > mind, I will be taking the latest code off SVN -- I like to >> > hear from >> > > the Java Lucene committers (and users who are playing or >> > using Lucene >> > > 2.9 off SVN) about those questions: >> > > >> > > 1) how stable the current code in the trunk is, >> > > 2) do you still have feature work to deliver or just bug fixes, and >> > > 3) what's your target date to release Java Lucene 2.9 >> > > >> > > #1 is important, such that is anyone using it in production? >> > > >> > > Yes, I did look at the current open issues in JIRA, but >> > that doesn't >> > > help me answer the above questions. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > >> > > -- George >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
