We went over the date in a previous thread on java-dev - since its just an estimate anyway, we decided to leave it.
Grant Ingersoll wrote: > +1, > > Two minor nits: The date in CHANGES.txt is wrong and I'm not crazy > about the 1.5 stuff that Uwe mentioned, but agreed we can live with > it. I so can't wait to flip that switch to 1.5 and be done with it > for a little while (until we start debating 1.5/1.6). > > BTW, going forward, I think we should be consistent w/ other ASF > projects and call our artifacts apache-lucene-X.zip, etc. and the > artifacts should unpack into apache-lucene-X/ directory. No need to > change for this release. > > -Grant > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> Okay, lets give this a shot: >> >> The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/ >> >> The changes are here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9changes/ >> >> >> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as 2.9.0, or point out >> any errors and I'll fix and repackage. >> >> We need at least 3 binding (PMC) votes. >> >> Thanks everyone for all their hard work on this! This has been some >> release. >> >> -- >> - Mark >> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
