> lucene wrote: > > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the > > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing). > > > > > I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I > give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could > find their way ;) > > Speaking of which, I basically plan to use the release announce that > I've been using. So if anyone has any gripes with it, or any further > suggestions, please weigh in soon.
+1 Thanks for creating the 2.4 branch! I would like to commit the fixes for the contrib-Java-1.4 breaks there, to forget about them and if we possibly have to release 2.9.1, it will compile the contribs designed for Java 1.4 By the way, I would also like to also copy the current 2.9 branch as the new backwards branch and create a new tag. When implementing generics, it would be good, if all tests compiled from version 2.9 with Java 1.4 would also run against 3.0 (to test if method signatures changed by having wrong upper bounds in the generics). When we removed deprecation, some tests also need to be removed in the backwards branch, but that can be done on request. Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
