> > lucene wrote: > > > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the > > > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing). > > > > > > > > I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I > > give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could > > find their way ;) > > > > Speaking of which, I basically plan to use the release announce that > > I've been using. So if anyone has any gripes with it, or any further > > suggestions, please weigh in soon. > > +1 > > Thanks for creating the 2.4 branch! I would like to commit the fixes for > the
Sorry, I meant 2.9 branch :-) > contrib-Java-1.4 breaks there, to forget about them and if we possibly > have > to release 2.9.1, it will compile the contribs designed for Java 1.4 > > By the way, I would also like to also copy the current 2.9 branch as the > new > backwards branch and create a new tag. When implementing generics, it > would > be good, if all tests compiled from version 2.9 with Java 1.4 would also > run > against 3.0 (to test if method signatures changed by having wrong upper > bounds in the generics). When we removed deprecation, some tests also need > to be removed in the backwards branch, but that can be done on request. > > Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
