Of course, John's running on his mac laptop, which also may be a factor, which is another reason why he wanted to see if these carried over onto a linux desktop (for example).
-jake On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's hard to read the column format, but if you look up above in the thread > from tonight, > you can see that yes, for PQ sizes less than 100 elements, multiPQ is > better, and only > starts to be worse at around 100 for strings, and 50 for ints. > > -jake > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 PM, John Wang <john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Please be patient with me. I am seeing a difference and was >> wondering >> > if Mike would see the same thing. >> >> Some differences are bound to be seen... with your changes (JVM >> changes, branch optimizations), are you seeing better average >> performance with multiPQ? >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >
