Yes Erik I'm instantiating a new IndexSearcher for every search.
-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 12:08 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 4:52 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: > I have slow subsequent searches. > And if i get the cache up and running is it persisted to disc? No, Lucene's caches are not persisted, only in RAM. Are you using a new IndexReader/IndexSearcher for your subsequent searches? If not, you're likely not leveraging any caches at all. Erik > > /Marcus > > > ________________________________ > > Från: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: on 2006-05-17 16:31 > Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Ämne: Re: Sort problematics > > > > On 5/17/06, Marcus Falck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I did a quite interesting notice, if i search for IndexId:x >> (IndexId is unique) with a sort it still takes very long time, >> which >> it doesn't without the sort. > > This will only be the case the first time you sort on a field because > a FieldCache entry is created for that field and then cached for > subsequent sorts. > > -Yonik > http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene > search server > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
