Hey Jeff, I didn´t had any luck, I don´t think you´re approach is going to
help me, thanks for the reply. I´ll try a solution that does not require
this kind of problem.
[]s
Rossini
On 7/29/07, Jeff French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Rossini, have you had any luck with this? I don't know if this solves
> your
> exact problem, but could you do something like this:
>
> 1. Use Analyzer.getPositionIncrementGap to create a gap (let's say 100)
> between your fieldA's.
> 2. Then query like this:
>
> fieldA:("termA termB"~99)
>
> I did this playing around with table cells, and it seems to work so far.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> rossini wrote:
> >
> > Actually no,
> >
> > Because I'd like to retrieve terms that were computed on the same
> > instance of Field. Taking your example to ilustrate better, I have 2
> > documents, on documentA I structured one field, Field("fieldA", "termA
> > termB", customAnalyzer). On documentB I structured 2 fields,
> > Field("fieldA",
> > "termA termC", customAnalyzer) and Field("fieldA", "termB termC",
> > customAnalyzer).
> >
> > The problem is, if I search like you suggested, fieldA:termA +
> > fieldA:termB, I will get both documents, but I want only documentA. For
> > that
> > to happen, somehow, somewhere should be an information that tells that
> on
> > documentA, termA and termB where indexed on the same instance of fieldA.
> > I´m
> > guessing this is not possible, but it would be great if someone has an
> > ideia
> > to solve this.
> >
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Search-terms-on-a-single-%22instance%22-of-field-tf4153674.html#a11855658
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
