Phil, I need to be more precise...
The files that I have are at, say: C:\dir1\dir2\ so, for example, I have C:\dir1\dir2\file-1-1.dat C:\dir1\dir2\file-1-2.dat C:\dir1\dir2\file-1-3.dat C:\dir1\dir2\file-1-4.dat C:\dir1\dir2\file-1-5.dat After indexing, and, using Luke, I look at the "path" field, and I see terms like (not in this order): C dir1 dir2 dat file-1-1 file-1-2 file-1-3 file-1-4 file-1-5 Notice that there is no (for example) term like "file-1-2.dat". I'm assuming this is because the analyzer is breaking that into "file-1-2" and "dat". As I said, based on the terms in Luke, I would have expected a web app query on: path:file-1-2 to succeed, and a query on: path:file-1-2.dat to fail. But, instead both of those succeed when I do a web query. Jim ---- oh...@cox.net wrote: > Phil, > > Both my indexer and the webapp are basically from the Lucene demos, the > indexer starting with the IndexFiles.java demo code, so I think they're both > using the StandardAnalyzer. > > What appears in Luke, when I select "path" is just the filename part, without > the extension, i.e., the "xxxx" part. > > That's why I said in my original post that I was kind of surprised that doing > a web query for "path:xxxx.yyy" succeeded, i.e, in the path field in the > index, there is no "xxxx.yyy", just "xxxx". > > Jim > > ---- Phil Whelan <phil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > > Are you using the same Analyzer for indexing and searching? xxxx.yyy > > will be seem as a HOSTNAME by StandardAnalyzer and will keep it as one > > term, whereas another indexer might split this into 2 terms. This > > should not matter either way as long as you are using the same > > Analyzer for both indexing and searching. > > > > I would expect this to pass unless you are using NOT_ANALYZED, or the > > WhitespaceAnalyzer, or something else that would not split on "/". > > path:xxxx.yyy > > > > In Luke, do you see 2 terms "xxxx" and "yyy", or just "xxxx.yyy", or > > something else? > > > > Thanks, > > Phil > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, <oh...@cox.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > In my indexer app (based on the IndexFiles.java demo), I am adding the > > > "path" field: > > > > > > doc.add(new Field("path", f.getPath(), Field.Store.YES, > > > Field.Index.ANALYZED)); > > > > > > Per Luke, the full path (e.g., "c:\....\xxxx.yyy") gets parsed, and one > > > of the terms (again, per Luke) is "xxxx", i.e., the actual file name, but > > > without the extension. > > > > > > Then, when I search with Luke for "path:xxxx", that succeeds, as > > > expected, and when I search with Luke for "path:xxxx.yyy", that fails, as > > > expected. > > > > > > But, if I search using the demo web app, for "path:xxxx.yyy", it succeeds. > > > > > > Since the Luke search for "path:xxxx.yyy" fails, I don't understand why > > > the web app search for "path:xxxx.yyy" would succeed? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jim > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org