On Tue, 3 May 2022 13:52:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This is nice work. I haven't seen it in detail, but I'm plannig to do so > later. > > What's the logistics here? There are two interrelated bugs: 6251738 and > 8226279. Are you going to add an 8226279 as an issue to this PR (`/issue add > 8226279`)? What about @bug tags in tests? Are they going to mention both > issues? For now, I'll track both, here in the PR and in tests. If this becomes impractical, I'll retain the old/original one and close the newer one. The old one described the problem; the newer one described a specific solution, although the actual implementation has move on from that proposed in 8226279. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8439
