In some way Java will be to its next language what C was to Java: > something you can call, but you need to be very careful. If we assume > that the new language runs on a JVM, then you should at least not have > the platform-dependency issues, but in terms of making assertions about > concurrency calling Java code from a nicer JVM language will always be > an issue. >
Java cleaned up all the library mess for c/c++ and had one standard on how to continue, do communications, UIs (or the promise), etc. I wonder if a new language that wants to win the market has to provide easy clustering, a good app server, a good way to write UIs and maybe a model that works as well as a web based app as a desktop app. Will it even be possible to replace java or are we at the point where replacing java would be just too much work and too costly? Ruben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
