Annotations are the recommended way however, as it facilitates validation. If you use em.createQuery(...) everything is late-bound and even less type checked than using a namedQuery. For SQL though, you are absolutely right but sadly SQL is no longer considered trendy.
/Casper On 3 Sep., 01:53, Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> wrote: > Casper Bang wrote: > > The issue goes a little deeper than your simple use case though. The > > Java enterprise world, due to the lack of expression trees, has to > > work with many thousands lines of embedded DSL (JPQL/HQL/SQL etc.). > > This poses several problems: > > > - How do you format/indent it? > > - How do you copy-paste between database tool and IDE? > > - How do you get help with the syntax? > > > By my experience, that is very much a real problem : > > > " select new com.somecompany.somexp.backend.model.ManagerInfoRecord("+ > > " c, b.itemNo, x )" + > > " from SomeEntity x" + > > " Join x.account a" + > > " Join a.baseData b" + > > " Join b.customer c "+ > > " where x.state <> com.somecompany.somexp.backend.entities.SomeEntity > > $ReadingState.InValid " + > > " and ( " + > > " (" + > > " x.someState = com.somecompany.somexp.backend.entities.SomeEntity > > $someState.Valid " + > > " and b.someData <> 'Y' " + > > " )" + > > " or x.someOtherState = > > com.somecompany.somexp.backend.entities.SomeEntity > > $someOtherState.Valid " + > > " )" + > > " and b.relatedEntity =:relatedEntity " + > > " and x.someForeignRelation <> > > com.somecompany.somexp.backend.entities.SomeEntity$EntityStateEnum.E > > " ), > > > And that's just one small annotation query (obfuscated to protect the > > innocent). Fun eh? :) > > You don't embed this sort of thing. You use getResourceAsStream() and a > separate file along with MessageFormat or such to perform substitutions > of live data if need be. > > Plain and simple. > > This also allows the IDE to do easily appropriate things for a .sql file > or the like. > > [In the XML sphere I'm all for sticking SVG, XSL FO, etc, directly > inside an XHTML document -- but this whole approach seems to be dying on > the vine there, even though the grammar is the same throughout all of > these.] > > -- > Jess Holle --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---