My understanding is that the goal of "coin" was small changes that don't affect the type system. That however doesn't preclude OTHER projects which DO touch the type system (I'm sure modularity is touching the type system for access levels at least).
Still - will be interesting to hear there reasoning behind the decision changes to include it. mark -- Pull me down under... On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Casper Bang <casper.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah it's confusing, what made them suddenly change their mind? And > doesn't this kinda portrait Coin as a joke (not wanting to touch the > type system, only small changes etc.). It feels like a last minute > 180, perhaps an attempt to keep up and not be characterized as a > legacy language? (which the blogosphere has been saturated with the > last couple of years) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=.
