On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> wrote: > I am heartened to hear that the spec referenced is not *too* official > yet. I don't have any *big *issues with it -- but on a syntactic level I > just really don't like the use of #. It seems oddly out of place when > compared to closures in other languages -- or in BGGA. >
This version is based on CLang<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-August/002670.html>, but with # instead of ^. # is used for method references because that is the syntax in javadoc. I would prefer ^ rather than # for function types and lambdas, but the current spec uses # for consistency with method references. Cheers, Neal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=.
