I have just started studying computational neuroscience. I have interests in this field . Thank you for your replies. I hope we can brainstorm and get answers to questions that we all think of as impossible at present .
Regards, jd On 5/27/10, Casper Bang <casper.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > May I ask what kind of science are you studying? > > On May 27, 4:23 am, jitesh dundas <jbdun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am not saying this because I want to be a marketing/political >> guy..That is the last thing to think off..l >> >> I just look at the possibilities that we could achieve in the near >> future. I hope you agree that we are moving in this direction.All >> inventions/discoveries ,including computers were a dream far distant. >> >> I am not overconfident but just simply optimistic. >> >> Sentience is possible in humans due to sensory motions and >> information communication mechanisms that work in sync with the brain. >> Which are the ways in which we could understand the human brain so as >> to make our computer achieve sentience.. >> >> Regards, >> Jitesh Dundas >> >> On 5/27/10, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: >> >> >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> >> > On 5/26/10 21:50 , jitesh dundas wrote: >> >> Thanks for your reply. However, I still think we can do it. Why do >> >> we think that such inventions are impossible. I am just expressing >> >> that we are on the road to success(when computers will have human >> >> like brains)..Very ue, this is difficult. However,not impossible. >> >> >> So I request you to look at the possibilities and not worry about >> >> the bad sides..I am optimistic,yes but I am being realisticly >> >> optimistic...We are on our way to achieving this. With so many >> >> brilliant scientists working on this and so much money involved, >> >> there is bound to be progress in this direction... >> >> > What I really don't understand, Jitesh, is your purpose about >> > discussing the topic. In our exchanges, you attributed to me the >> > arguments "rat brains are simple" and "rat have not been made for >> > designing software" (in the mail that didn't get through the mailing >> > list). Now you talk about bad sides (I'm not sure if "you" refers to >> > me or generically to all the people here, as somebody talked about >> > "bad sides"). But the most common answer that you are getting here is >> > that the thing is extremely much more complex than you think and it >> > could be even impossible. We could be wrong, of course, and I'd like >> > to hear some counter-argument from you; but everything you >> > counter-answer is that you're optimistic and it can be surely done. >> > What's the point? :-) Such an attitude without arguments is more >> > suitable to marketing or politics, rather than science/technology. >> >> > - -- >> > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager >> > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." >> > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici -www.tidalwave.it/people >> > fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) >> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> > iEYEARECAAYFAkv9f/0ACgkQeDweFqgUGxcyswCfQr/QOWlNoYbaW4QQWm6OFHab >> > 00QAn1gtH1ZdUkpBuvULeZqkCLiWADcb >> > =kkpk >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
