If they did agree on one it would probably be C++, so let's not go
down that road!

I don't see what's so bad about having JavaScript as a compilation target.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Carl Jokl <carl.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I must confess I am not so fond of dynamic typing. I like the fact
>> that the compiler can catch a lot of mistakes at compile time in a
>> statically typed language.
>
> I understand that. There are excellent arguments for using both static
> and dynamically typed languages. I think we've all heard them by now.
> No point rehashing them. People that feel strongly about using
> strongly typed languages are not going to like JavaScript.
>
>> I can appreciate many like dynamically
>> typed languages. What is annoying at the moment is that people simply
>> have no choice. If the scripting engine provided an intermediate
>> format that compilers could target then developers could use what they
>> prefer.
>
> More choice would be good, but I don't see it happening. Most people
> won't use a new browser-supported programming language unless it is
> supported by at least IE, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. It's hard to
> imagine the groups that control those browsers agreeing on a new
> language to support.
>
> --
> R. Mark Volkmann
> Object Computing, Inc.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to