On Dec 11, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Miroslav Pokorny wrote: > I never said my comments were perfect but IMHO it makes sense to pick ppl > directly related to the problem at hand. > > When outlining something about say a jsr about money - pick banks or > jodastephen, for a jsf related jsr pick from ice faces, rich faces etc. Btw > these are just examples I'm not saying I like or dislike jsf etc. > > I'm sorry ppl don't reply accurately to my original comment which quite > clearly qualified my comments referring to the java 7/8 jsrs. By cutting bits > out and only saying jsr/jcp they have lost the context of the original > thought.
I'm not disagreeing with the point you are trying to make, but what you are saying is that you don't think the JCP is structured correctly. Unless Oracle gets a clue you are going to have to look for another standards body for that. Ralhp -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
