On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Miroslav Pokorny < miroslav.poko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Eric Newcomer <enewco...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> For example you appear to have no idea how JCP votes are carried out, yet >> feel free to imply corruption. Please check your facts if you expect anyone >> to take you seriously. I will no doubt regret replying when I see your >> response. Doesn't have to be that way, but I'm afraid it is. >> >> Eric >> > It is not corrupt to get your friends to vote for you, corruption has quite > a different meaning i would suggest you look up a dictionary - do not put > words in my mouth. I just made an observation given the relatively low voter > count in such an election and the fact that SC has 13000 developers its not > hard to figure out that a lot of friends and employees must have voted a > certain way. > Why don't you spend ten minutes reading how the JCP works? Then you'll understand why the voter count was so low. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
