On 29 October 2012 22:13, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote: > My main complaint about them is that well… they're USELESS unless you're the > API designer - and they're anti-modular. >
The problem being solved is "Interface Evolution". Do you think just interface evolution is the wrong goal, or that the implementation of that is bad? To me, for what the stated problem is, default methods seem reasonable. w.r.t. 'anti-modular', I'd like to hear more on what you mean by this. Do you mean that there's no way to organise default methods except as being in the same file as the interface declaration? Kind regards, Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
