On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Ricky Clarkson <ricky.clark...@gmail.com> wrote: > As for pattern-matching, there's nothing inherently bad about it, but > usually or perhaps always with scala.Option, there's a better way of > writing code using HOFs.
So, in my example, what should I have done instead? I should say the function returning an Object that might be null was from a java library. And the "do something with class I know" was less than 2 lines in each case. Seemed perfectly succinct and readable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
