On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote:

On 14 Feb 2014, at 10:13, Jan Goyvaerts wrote:
>
> > I think the mentioned downsides summarize it quite well: It is already
> > obsolete - before even being released.
>
> Maybe, but I'm wondering if a lot of the recent FUD over Scala's internals

Are you referring to Paul Phillips' recent
talk<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-user/ImqlClXTrS4%5B151-175-false%5D>
?

It's the opinion of an expert who's spent the last five years of his life
working on his topic, calling this FUD is quite unfair. Paul goes also
quite a bit further than just criticizing the Scala collections, he's
basically saying "I don't care so much about languages, languages are just
tools. All I want is good tools to write good software". He's quite
emotional about that.

By the way, the link above is an extended version of his talk, which
includes the questions and answers at the end (I found the comments about
Twitter's use of Scala quite interesting).
-- 
Cédric

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to