On 24 February 2014 22:10, Cédric Beust ♔ <ced...@beust.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:59 AM, phil swenson <phil.swen...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The reason I brought up Play/Akka is as far as I know is there is no
>> equiv on ceylon/kotlin/etc.  if someone wants to adopt a new language, it
>> sure is nice if you don’t have to roll your own ecosystem.
>>
>
> Both have a Java version so I don't see any issue there. That's assuming
> you'd want to use either of these (Play has some good momentum but I don't
> see a lot of traction for Akka outside the bleeding edge Scala crowd).
>
>
I should have thought that it's very rare nowadays to use Scala without
Akka; especially when you consider that Futures are also a part of Akka
that's been integrated into core Scala with recent releases.

Akka isn't *only* about actors, that's just the most publicised part.


> --
> Cédric
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to