Hi,

Messed up my local CVS. :-(  Might be a while...

-Dan

On 6 Aug 00, at 16:27, Dan OConnor wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm about to attempt to check in some files related to security. 
> Since no one had any objections to the architecture I proposed, I 
> have basically a "no-op" skeleton for it: static client methods to set 
> the principal and credential; role mapping that eliminates the 
> indirection and uses the role as-is; no bean-to-bean context 
> propagation; and authentication that just checks the password by 
> making sure it is the same as the user name. We can add more 
> realistic functionality next. (If there is a null principal, 
> authentication/authorization is skipped. This is so people who want 
> to can play with the security stuff, and people who don't can ignore 
> it for now.)
> 
> I've never used CVS before, so I apologize in advance for all the 
> chaos I'm about to cause. (I had to change a lot of key files, for 
> things like propagation of security contexts...)
> 
> -Dan
> 



Reply via email to