At 10:25 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote: > >Peter wrote: >> >> Besides that you seem to be under impression that you can >> legally integrate them together which is false. > >The number of posts on this subject is so large that it's difficult >for me to find where you've supported this claim. Could you point >me to the specific clause in the LGPL that supports your position? email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask for their opinion. Phrase it "Why can't I link against propritry libraries that are not part of OS/compiler?". Easiest way to do it. Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *------------------------------------------------------*
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Vincent Sheffer
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Jay Walters
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat updat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat ... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... Peter Donald
