> At 05:56 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote: > > Well obviously he wasn't told full details. Try going and doing just a > little bit of reading so you can vaguyely grasp the idea of (L)GPL. Hey now, I see no reason to be insulting. Especially since the person making the claim is not willing to shoulder the onus of supporting it. That would be you. ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat upd... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
