> At 06:46 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote: > > Rickard has already pointed it out. Do you think > he is a liar ? or wrong ? If so then say so but > why should I put in extra effort just because you > don't want to read Rickards post ? Jeezus H. Christ on a popsicle stick, Peter. Courtesy. Common freaking courtesy. My original note explained that I was having difficulty finding the quoted clause in this thread. You didn't have to be the person to respond. Anybody could have done it. By default, I'd like to think that non-helpful responses simply don't get posted -- by default. Normally I'd behave that way, but I was actually (gasp!) hoping to get an answer to my question. Please, fellow list members, forgive me for being so naive. ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Ole Husgaard
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
