> At 06:27 4/11/00 -0600, you wrote: > > I don't have to proove anything with respect to veracity > of (L)GPL. All I have to do is point you towards the > philosophy/licensing pages at gnu.org. It is all explained > clearly there. Is it really? I have been reading it, as have many others (I presume) who are following this thread, yet I can find no reference to what you've been talking about. I can see where you're comming from with respect to the GPL. I cannot find any problems with the LGPL. In fact, your constant lumping of the two licenses together (re: the term "(L)GPL") makes me think that it is you who lack a fundamental understanding. This, Peter, is why I asked you to quote specifics. If you are unable to do so, admit it. If you are unwilling to do so, let's put your claim in a FAQ and be done with it. ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat upd... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Peter Donald
- [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL pohl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] examining the LGPL Ole Husgaard
