> At 06:27  4/11/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
> I don't have to proove anything with respect to veracity 
> of (L)GPL. All I have to do is point you towards the 
> philosophy/licensing pages at gnu.org. It is all explained 
> clearly there.

Is it really?  I have been reading it, as have many others
(I presume) who are following this thread, yet I can find
no reference to what you've been talking about.  I can see
where you're comming from with respect to the GPL.

I cannot find any problems with the LGPL.  In fact, your
constant lumping of the two licenses together (re: the term
"(L)GPL") makes me think that it is you who lack a fundamental
understanding.

This, Peter, is why I asked you to quote specifics.  If you
are unable to do so, admit it.

If you are unwilling to do so, let's put your claim in a FAQ
and be done with  it.

----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to